TuniCyberLabs
Services
Products
About
Blog
Contact
TuniCyberLabs

Your technology partner for AI, cybersecurity, cloud, and infrastructure solutions. Helping businesses across Tunisia and beyond grow smarter.

Stay in the loop

Threat research and product notes, no spam, double opt-in.

Confirm your email using the link we send before your subscription starts.

Privacy notice

Services

  • ▸Custom Software Development
  • ▸AI Solutions
  • ▸Cybersecurity
  • ▸Cloud Services
  • ▸Hosting & Infrastructure

Industries

  • ▸Banking & Finance
  • ▸Healthcare
  • ▸Retail & E-Commerce
  • ▸Manufacturing

Company

  • ▸About Us
  • ▸Blog

Products

  • ▸All products
  • ▸TuniReach
  • ▸TuniRise
  • ▸TuniCall

Platform

  • ▸Contact

Contact

  • contact@tunicyberlabs.com
  • +216 99 800 151
  • Based in Sousse and Estonia.

Legal

  • ▸Privacy
  • ▸Terms
  • ▸Acceptable Use
  • ▸Responsible Disclosure

© 2026 TUNICYBERLABS // ALL_RIGHTS_RESERVED

Cybersecurity
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Blog
  4. /
  5. Attacking Active Directory: Kerberos Paths and Tiered Defense

Attacking Active Directory: Kerberos Paths and Tiered Defense

TuniCyberLabs Team
May 15, 2026
7 min read

How red teams walk the path from one user to Domain Admin through Kerberos abuse, and the tiered model that shuts it down.

In this article

  1. The attack paths defenders underestimate
  2. Where Kerberos hands over the keys
  3. Mapping the graph with BloodHound
  4. A tiered model that actually holds

Active Directory (AD) still authenticates most enterprise workforces more than two decades after release, and it remains the richest target on nearly every internal network. When a red team lands a foothold on a corporate laptop, the laptop is never the objective. The prize is the path from one unprivileged user to Domain Admin, and Active Directory hands attackers an unusually generous map to walk it.

Those paths exist because AD is a distributed trust system optimized for administrative convenience: nested groups, delegated permissions, service accounts with excessive rights, and certificate templates configured a decade ago and never reviewed. None of these are vulnerabilities in the CVE sense. They are design and configuration choices that compose into a chain, and defenders who patch diligently but never audit relationships stay exposed.

The attack paths defenders underestimate

Most AD compromises do not rely on a memory-corruption exploit. They abuse features working exactly as designed.

  • ▸Kerberoasting: Any authenticated user can request a service ticket for an account with a Service Principal Name, then crack it offline. Service accounts with weak passwords and domain admin rights turn this into game over.
  • ▸AS-REP roasting: Accounts with Kerberos pre-authentication disabled leak a crackable hash to any requester who asks.
  • ▸Unconstrained and constrained delegation: Misconfigured delegation lets a compromised host impersonate other users, including privileged ones, to back-end services.
  • ▸Active Directory Certificate Services (ADCS): A family of template misconfigurations, publicly catalogued as ESC1 through ESC8, can let a low-privileged user enroll a certificate that authenticates as a domain admin.

Where Kerberos hands over the keys

Kerberos was designed to reduce password exposure on the wire, but its ticketing model creates offline-crackable material and impersonation primitives. Kerberoasting is attractive precisely because it is quiet: requesting a service ticket is normal behavior, so the noisy part, offline cracking, happens on the attacker's own hardware. Golden and silver tickets go further; once an operator extracts the KRBTGT hash, they can forge tickets for arbitrary users and persist through password resets. ADCS abuse has become the modern favorite because a forged or maliciously enrolled certificate survives credential rotation entirely and is rarely monitored.

Mapping the graph with BloodHound

You cannot defend a relationship you have never visualized. BloodHound and its data collectors ingest AD objects and render them as a graph where every edge is a usable privilege: member-of, has-session, can-reset-password, generic-write. The tool's killer feature is its shortest-path query: pick any owned principal, ask for the route to Domain Admins, and the graph returns the exact chain of abuses. Red teams use it to plan; blue teams should run the same queries first and delete the edges before an attacker finds them.

A tiered model that actually holds

Microsoft's tiering guidance, now folded into its Enterprise Access Model, is the durable fix, but it only works as a hard boundary rather than a diagram. A practical rollout looks like this:

1. Classify assets into tiers: Tier 0 for identity systems (domain controllers, ADCS, sync servers), Tier 1 for servers and applications, Tier 2 for workstations. 2. Bind admin credentials to their tier: A Tier 0 admin account must never authenticate to a Tier 2 workstation, where its credentials can be harvested. 3. Use privileged access workstations for all Tier 0 administration, isolated from email and browsing. 4. Purge SPNs from privileged accounts and give service accounts group-managed passwords (gMSA) so Kerberoasting yields nothing crackable. 5. Audit ADCS templates for dangerous enrollment and enrollment-agent rights, and enable certificate mapping enforcement. 6. Re-run BloodHound quarterly and treat any new path into Tier 0 as an incident, not a backlog item.

The engineering trade-off is real: strict tiering slows administrators down and demands discipline that convenience-driven IT resists. But the alternative is a graph in which one phished helpdesk account reaches the domain controller in three hops.

For a business, hardening AD is the highest-leverage internal security investment available, because it is the substrate everything else trusts. A red team that maps these paths and a blue team that closes them together turn the enterprise's most-attacked system into its best-instrumented one, and that resilience is exactly what regulators, insurers, and customers now expect organizations to prove rather than assert.

TAGS
Active DirectoryKerberosRed TeamingBloodHoundPrivilege Escalation

Need help with
this topic
?

Our team specializes in the technologies and strategies discussed in this article. Let’s talk about how we can help your business.

Get in Touch

Related
Articles

Cybersecurity

The npm Package Has a Green Badge. Do You Know What Your Product Installed?

Trusted publishing improves release identity. Turn provenance into a practical dependency decision by verifying the exact artifact, its source and the policy your build enforces.

Cybersecurity

Post-Quantum Procurement in the UK: Make Two Suppliers Connect Before You Commit

A post-quantum feature label does not establish interoperability. Build a small connection pilot that exposes protocol, certificate and support dependencies.

Cybersecurity

Deepfakes Beat Legacy Processes, Not Legacy Firewalls

Voice and video cloning does not break your network, it breaks approval workflows that treat recognition as authentication. Here are the out-of-band verification and dual control habits that still survive.

Back to all articles